Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Our Story
  • The Cravath System
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Pro Bono
  • Alumni Journal
  • 200.Cravath

Cravath’s London Office Moves to 100 Cheapside

Read More

News & Insights

Qualcomm Board Wins Dismissal of Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit Related to Antitrust Claims

August 03, 2016

On August 1, 2016, Vice Chancellor Tamika R. Montgomery‑Reeves of the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed a shareholder derivative lawsuit brought derivatively on behalf of Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) against the Board of Directors of Qualcomm. The lawsuit alleged that the Qualcomm Board breached its fiduciary duties by ignoring purported “red flags” which supposedly showed that Qualcomm was violating international competition law. Plaintiff did not demand that the Board pursue its claims before bringing this action, claiming that would be futile because a majority of the Directors faced a substantial likelihood of personal liability as to the underlying claims. In granting the dismissal, Vice Chancellor Montgomery‑Reeves held that the complaint did not plead sufficient facts to infer that the Directors faced a substantial likelihood of personal liability or that they acted in bad faith.

The Cravath team, which represented the Board, included partner Rachel G. Skaistis, who argued the motion to dismiss, and associates Leslie W. Regenbaum and Kimberly M. Jeffers. The case is Melbourne Municipal Firefighters’ Pension Trust Fund v. Paul E. Jacobs, et al., No. 10872‑VCMR (Del. Ch.).

Related Practices & Industries

  • Litigation
  • Shareholder Derivative Actions
  • Board and Officer Representation
  • Telecommunications
  • Technology

People

Photo
Name
Rachel G. Skaistis
Title
Litigation
Title
Partner
Email
rskaistis@cravath.com
Phone
+1-212-474-1934
vCard
Download vCard

    Education

    • J.D., 1997, Cornell Law School
      cum laude
    • B.A., 1992, Yale College

    Admitted In

    • New York

    Related News & Insights

    Deals & Cases

    June 04, 2025

    QUALCOMM Incorporated’s $1.5 Billion Registered Notes Offering

    Cravath represented QUALCOMM Incorporated in connection with its $1.5 billion registered notes offering. QUALCOMM Incorporated is a global technology leader, helping to bring intelligent computing everywhere through the development and commercialization of foundational technologies. The transaction closed on May 21, 2025.

    Deals & Cases

    August 22, 2024

    QUALCOMM Incorporated’s $4 Billion Revolving Credit Facility

    Cravath represented QUALCOMM Incorporated in connection with its $4 billion revolving credit. QUALCOMM Incorporated is a global leader in the development and commercialization of foundational technologies for the wireless industry. The transaction closed on August 8, 2024.

    Deals & Cases

    September 29, 2023

    Qualcomm Wins Summary Judgment in Putative Antitrust Class Action

    On September 26, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted summary judgment in favor of Cravath client Qualcomm Incorporated in a putative class action alleging violations of antitrust laws. Originally brought in 2017 on behalf of an alleged nationwide class of mobile device purchaser plaintiffs, the multi-district litigation consolidated numerous complaints against Qualcomm and followed a related Federal Trade Commission action against the company (FTC v. Qualcomm), which also resulted in a complete judgment for Qualcomm on appeal in 2020.

    Deals & Cases

    June 16, 2017

    Qualcomm Directors and Officers Win Dismissal of Shareholder Derivative Suit Related to Purported FCPA Violations

    On June 16, 2017, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed a stockholder derivative lawsuit brought against current and former directors and officers of Qualcomm Incorporated alleging, among other claims, that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by allegedly failing to prevent purported FCPA violations by the company. In granting the dismissal, Vice Chancellor Tamika R. Montgomery‑Reeves held that the complaint did not plead sufficient facts to infer that the individual defendants had acted in bad faith or that the directors faced a substantial likelihood of personal liability such that plaintiffs’ failure to make a demand on the board to bring a suit was excused.

    Cravath Bicentennial

    Celebrating 200 years of partnership. In 2019, we celebrated our bicentennial. Our history mirrors that of our nation. Integral to our story is our culture.

    Explore

    Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
    • CONTACT US
    • OUR STORY
    • ALUMNI PORTAL
    • DISCLAIMERS & NOTICES

    Attorney Advertising. ©2025 Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.