Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Our Story
  • The Cravath System
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Pro Bono
  • Alumni Journal
  • 200.Cravath

Cravath’s London Office Moves to 100 Cheapside

Read More

News & Insights

PG&E Secures California Supreme Court Victory Shielding Company from Liability for Public Safety Power Shutoffs

November 27, 2023

On November 20, 2023, the California Supreme Court held that Cravath client PG&E, the country’s largest utility, cannot be sued for losses incurred by customers during public safety power shutoffs that complied with the guidelines set forth by its regulator, the California Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”). In a unanimous decision, the Court held that such claims are barred because their adjudication would interfere with the PUC’s comprehensive supervision and regulation of safety shutoffs.

Throughout the fall of 2019, PG&E conducted a series of emergency power shutoffs, called Public Safety Power Shutoffs, to reduce the risk that its utility infrastructure would ignite a wildfire during extreme weather conditions. Plaintiff Anthony Gantner sued PG&E, alleging that these power shutoffs were necessitated by PG&E’s negligence in maintaining its power grid over multiple decades and that Californians harmed by these shutoffs are entitled to $2.5 billion in damages.

Gantner initially filed this lawsuit during PG&E’s bankruptcy in 2019. PG&E moved in the Bankruptcy Court for a dismissal of the complaint with prejudice, arguing that the claims are preempted by California Public Utilities Code Section 1759 (which preempts claims that hinder or interfere with the PUC’s regulatory authority) and otherwise barred by PG&E’s tariff rules. The Bankruptcy Court dismissed the complaint, holding that the action was preempted by Section 1759. Mr. Gantner appealed that decision to the federal district court, which agreed with the bankruptcy court and again found that his negligence claim was barred by Section 1759.

Mr. Gantner then appealed that decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in January 2022. Citing the “significant public policy implications for California residents and utilities” raised by this case, the Ninth Circuit certified two questions to the California Supreme Court:

1.  Whether Section 1759 preempted Gantner’s negligence claim, and

2.  Whether PG&E’s tariff rule barred Gantner’s negligence claim.

The California Supreme Court ruled in favor of PG&E on the first issue. “The PUC has authorized the regulated use of PSPS events as a ‘last resort,’ endorsing the practice where the public safety benefits of a reduced risk of wildfire ignition outweigh the harms of lost power,” the Court wrote. “By seeking billions of dollars in alleged damages resulting directly from power shutoffs, Gantner’s suit would ‘hinder or frustrate’ the PUC’s carefully designed implementation calculus.”

Because the California Supreme Court agreed with PG&E’s argument that Gantner’s lawsuit was barred by Section 1759, the Court did not reach the second issue presented by the Ninth Circuit.

Cravath served as lead counsel for PG&E before the California Supreme Court and in related proceedings before the United States Bankruptcy Court, the United States District Court, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Cravath team representing PG&E before the California Supreme Court includes partner Omid H. Nasab, of counsel Nicholas S. Medling and associates Melissa A. Syring and Paula Zampietro.

The case is Gantner v. PG&E Corp., No. S273340 (Cal. 2023).

Related Practices & Industries

  • Litigation
  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy Litigation
  • Class Action Defense
  • General Commercial Disputes
  • Mass Torts and Product Liability
  • Utilities and Infrastructure Litigation

People

Photo
Name
Omid H. Nasab
Title
Litigation
Title
Partner
Email
onasab@cravath.com
Phone
+1-212-474-1972
vCard
Download vCard

    Education

    • J.D., 2006, Columbia Law School
      Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar
    • A.B., 2002, Duke University

    Admitted In

    • New York
    Photo
    Name
    Nicholas S. Medling
    Title
    Litigation
    Title
    Of Counsel
    Email
    nmedling@cravath.com
    Phone
    +1-212-474-1378
    vCard
    Download vCard

      Education

      • J.D., 2016, Stanford Law School
      • B.A., 2012, Claremont McKenna College
        summa cum laude

      Admitted In

      • New York
      • California

      Related News & Insights

      Deals & Cases

      November 15, 2023

      Robinhood Defeats Certification of Proposed Class Asserting Securities Claims in Sprawling “Meme Stock” Litigation

      On November 13, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class asserting market manipulation claims under the federal securities laws against Cravath clients Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC and Robinhood Securities, LLC (together, “Robinhood”).

      Deals & Cases

      October 12, 2023

      Williams Secures Delaware Supreme Court Victory Affirming Trial Win with $600 Million Judgment

      On October 10, 2023, following a full trial on the merits and an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, Cravath client The Williams Companies, Inc. (“Williams”) secured a victory resulting in a judgment of more than $600 million.

      Deals & Cases

      October 09, 2023

      Abiomed Defeats Motion to Dismiss Lawsuit Over Misappropriated Trade Secrets

      On September 22, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in favor of Cravath clients Abiomed, Inc. and Abiomed Europe GmbH (together, “Abiomed”), denying a motion to dismiss litigation brought by Abiomed against German defendants Enmodes GmbH and its CEO Tim Kaufmann.

      Deals & Cases

      September 29, 2023

      Qualcomm Wins Summary Judgment in Putative Antitrust Class Action

      On September 26, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted summary judgment in favor of Cravath client Qualcomm Incorporated in a putative class action alleging violations of antitrust laws. Originally brought in 2017 on behalf of an alleged nationwide class of mobile device purchaser plaintiffs, the multi-district litigation consolidated numerous complaints against Qualcomm and followed a related Federal Trade Commission action against the company (FTC v. Qualcomm), which also resulted in a complete judgment for Qualcomm on appeal in 2020.

      Cravath Bicentennial

      Celebrating 200 years of partnership. In 2019, we celebrated our bicentennial. Our history mirrors that of our nation. Integral to our story is our culture.

      Explore

      Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
      • CONTACT US
      • OUR STORY
      • ALUMNI PORTAL
      • DISCLAIMERS & NOTICES

      Attorney Advertising. ©2025 Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.