Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Our Story
  • The Cravath System
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Pro Bono
  • Alumni Journal
  • 200.Cravath

Cravath’s London Office Moves to 100 Cheapside

Read More

News & Insights

Polar Air Cargo Worldwide Wins Dismissal of Civil RICO and Other Claims

August 31, 2023

On August 30 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed all claims brought against Cravath client Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. (“Polar”) by Cargo on Demand, Inc. (“COD”) alleging violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and other claims brought under New York state law.

Polar is an international cargo airline and joint venture between Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. and DHL. COD alleged that from 2014 to 2021, there was an agreement between Polar’s former freight forwarder customer, COD, and several former members of Polar’s senior management, wherein COD paid what it called “consulting fees” to LLCs owned by the Polar executives as a condition of doing business with Polar. COD further alleged that after entering into a partnership with Polar, under which it shared commercially sensitive information, and ceasing payment of those fees, Polar took a series of actions which harmed COD’s business, including terminating the agreement between the companies.

COD brought claims against Polar under RICO and New York state common law. Cravath filed a motion to dismiss COD’s complaint in January 2023, arguing that COD’s substantive RICO claim did not allege a RICO enterprise because it did not allege Polar was distinct from the other members of the RICO enterprise, the former Polar executives and their LLCs. Cravath also contended that COD’s complaint failed to allege a pattern of racketeering activity, in part because COD failed to plead wire fraud with particularity. Cravath also argued that COD’s RICO conspiracy claim should be dismissed for those same reasons and the Court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over COD’s state law claims.

In his opinion, Judge Jesse M. Furman agreed with Cravath’s arguments that COD had not alleged a RICO enterprise or a pattern of racketeering activity. With respect to the RICO enterprise, Judge Furman ruled that COD’s alleged enterprise consisted of Polar associating with its own employees and companies controlled by Polar management, and that did not satisfy RICO’s distinctness requirement. As to the pattern of racketeering, the Court rejected each of COD’s alleged predicate acts and held that COD failed to satisfy Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard as to its wire fraud claims.

The Cravath team was led by partners Wes Earnhardt and Benjamin Gruenstein and practice area attorney Lindsay J. Timlin. Mila Gauvin II also worked on this matter.

The case is Cargo on Demand, Inc. v. Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc., No. 22‑cv‑10243 (S.D.N.Y.).

Related Practices & Industries

  • Litigation
  • General Commercial Disputes

People

Photo
Name
Wes Earnhardt
Title
Litigation
Title
Partner
Email
wearnhardt@cravath.com
Phone
+1-212-474-1138
vCard
Download vCard

    Education

    • J.D., 2004, University of North Carolina School of Law
    • B.A., 2000, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
      Phi Beta Kappa

    Admitted In

    • New York
    Photo
    Name
    Benjamin Gruenstein
    Title
    Litigation
    Title
    Partner
    Email
    bgruenstein@cravath.com
    Phone
    +1-212-474-1080
    vCard
    Download vCard

      Education

      • J.D., 1999, Harvard Law School
        magna cum laude
      • A.B., 1996, Harvard College
        Phi Beta Kappa, summa cum laude

      Admitted In

      • New York
      • District of Columbia
      Photo
      Name
      Lindsay J. Timlin
      Title
      Litigation
      Title
      Practice Area Attorney
      Email
      ltimlin@cravath.com
      Phone
      +1-212-474-1281
      vCard
      Download vCard

        Education

        • J.D., 2009, Columbia Law School
          Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar
        • B.A., 2004, University of Virginia

        Admitted In

        • New York

        Related News & Insights

        Deals & Cases

        October 03, 2022

        Buckeye Wins Affirmance of Dismissal of Claims Challenging its Acquisition by IFM

        On October 3, 2022, the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware issued an order affirming the Delaware Court of Chancery’s dismissal of claims brought against Cravath clients Buckeye Partners, L.P., Buckeye GP LLC, and Buckeye GP LLC’s board of directors (collectively, “Buckeye”) by a former unitholder, Walter E. Ryan, Jr.

        Deals & Cases

        August 29, 2022

        Williams Wins Interest and Fee Motion Against ETE Following Judgment for $410 Million Contractual Breakup Fee

        On August 25, 2022, the Delaware Court of Chancery granted in full Cravath client The Williams Companies, Inc.’s (“Williams”) motion for interest, attorneys’ fees and expenses, totaling more than $185 million at the time the motion was taken under submission. The decision followed post‑trial discovery, briefing and oral argument between January and May 2022.

        Deals & Cases

        August 11, 2022

        Morgan Stanley Wins Dismissal of Claims with Prejudice in Lawsuit Related to Italian Shipping Company’s Restructuring

        On August 5, 2022, the New York Supreme Court, Commercial Division, dismissed with prejudice a lawsuit brought by Moby S.p.A., one of the world’s largest passenger shipping companies, against Cravath client Morgan Stanley and two of its employees. The lawsuit was related to Moby’s restructuring proceeding in Milan, Italy.

        Deals & Cases

        July 14, 2022

        Starz Wins Appeal Affirming Timeliness of Copyright Infringement Claims

        On July 14, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a precedential decision affirming the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California’s holding that the Copyright Act did not impose a time‑based bar on damages for copyright infringement claims separate from the three‑year statute of limitations and that, therefore, the copyright infringement claims brought by Cravath client Starz Entertainment, LLC (“Starz”) were timely.

        Cravath Bicentennial

        Celebrating 200 years of partnership. In 2019, we celebrated our bicentennial. Our history mirrors that of our nation. Integral to our story is our culture.

        Explore

        Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
        • CONTACT US
        • OUR STORY
        • ALUMNI PORTAL
        • DISCLAIMERS & NOTICES

        Attorney Advertising. ©2025 Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.