Andrei
Harasymiak

A representative list of Mr. Harasymiak’s matters includes:

Intellectual Property Litigation

• Abiomed, Inc. v. Maquet Cardiovascular LLC and Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed, Inc.:  Representation of Abiomed in two patent infringement actions relating to heart pumps.
• In the Matter of Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof: Representation of Qualcomm in an International Trade Commission investigation relating to mobile devices.

• AbbVie, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.: Representation of Amgen in a patent infringement action under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act relating to a biosimilar medication.

• Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Representation of Alarm.com in a patent infringement action relating to remote monitoring and control of equipment, including petitions for inter partes review of the asserted patents.

• ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated: Representation of Qualcomm in a patent infringement action relating to downconversion of RF signals to baseband in wireless communication devices.

• iControl Networks, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Representation of Alarm.com in a patent infringement action relating to home security and automation systems.

• Federal Treasury Enterprise Sojuzplodoimport v. Spirits International B.V.: Representation of Spirits International in an action relating to ownership of vodka trademarks.

• Xerox Corporation v. Google Inc.: Representation of Xerox in a patent infringement action relating to semantic text analysis and web advertising.

• SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline v. Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Representation of GSK in a Hatch‑Waxman patent infringement action relating to Avodart, a drug for benign prostate hypertrophy.

• Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated: Representation of Qualcomm in post‑trial proceedings in a patent infringement action relating to mobile device chips and technology.

• In re ‘845 Patent Litigation and Glaxo Group Ltd. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Representation of GSK in Hatch‑Waxman patent infringement actions relating to Imitrex, an anti‑migraine drug.

• Compuware Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation v. Compuware Corporation: Representation of IBM in copyright and patent infringement actions relating to mainframe computer software.

• In re Papst Licensing, GmbH Patent Litigation: Representation of IBM in a patent infringement action relating to hard disk drive motor technology.

Other Matters

• United States of America v. NCR Corporation et al. and Georgia‑Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. NCR Corporation: Representation of NCR in CERCLA actions involving remediation of PCBs in the Fox River in Wisconsin and the Kalamazoo River in Michigan.

• Representation of Qualcomm in an investigation into patent licensing agreements initiated by the National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China.

• QSGI Inc. v. IBM Global Financing: Representation of IBM in an antitrust case involving mainframe computers.

• Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated: Representation of Qualcomm in a California state court action alleging unfair competition, breach of contract and fraud.

Mr. Harasymiak was born in New York City. He received an A.B. magna cum laude from Harvard College in 1987 and a J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1994. Mr. Harasymiak joined Cravath in 1994 and was named of counsel in 2021. He is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Southern District of New York and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.