Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Our Story
  • The Cravath System
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Pro Bono
  • Alumni Journal
  • 200.Cravath

Cravath’s London Office Moves to 100 Cheapside

Read More

News & Insights

Boston Red Sox Win Dismissal of Putative Electronic “Sign‑Stealing” Class Action Lawsuit

April 06, 2020

On April 3, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed, with prejudice, purported class action litigation brought by fantasy sports contestants against Cravath client Boston Red Sox Baseball Club, L.P. (the “Red Sox”), as well as Major League Baseball and MLB Advanced Media, L.P. (collectively “MLB”) and the Houston Astros, LLC (the “Astros”). The named plaintiffs in the suit were five individuals who, between 2017 and 2019, participated in daily fantasy baseball contests hosted by DraftKings Inc. (“DraftKings”). On behalf of themselves and similarly situated DraftKings participants, plaintiffs alleged that the Red Sox and Astros engaged in electronic sign‑stealing in violation of MLB rules and that the MLB failed to prevent, remedy and disclose the violation. They further alleged that the electronic sign‑stealing schemes improperly impacted player statistics, which form the basis for fantasy contests, and thereby corrupted the DraftKings contests promoted by defendants. Plaintiffs asserted various fraud, negligence, unjust enrichment and consumer protection law claims based on alleged harm arising from the electronic “sign‑stealing” scandal.

In granting Cravath’s motion to dismiss, the Court rejected the claims and the notion that professional sports organizations owe fantasy participants any duty of care absent a transaction or other relationship between them. In his decision, U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff noted that “the absence of duty and reliance forecloses plaintiffs’ fraud and negligence claims, and the lack of a transaction, relationship or other nexus forecloses plaintiffs’ consumer protection claims.”

The Cravath team was led by partners Michael T. Reynolds and Lauren A. Moskowitz, who argued the motion, and included practice area attorney Hector J. Valdes and associate Feyilana Lawoyin. Zachary W. Jarrett, Miranda Li and Ravinder Singh also worked on the matter.

The case is Olson v. Major League Baseball, No. 20‑CV‑632 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.).

Related Practices & Industries

  • Litigation
  • Class Action Defense
  • General Commercial Disputes

People

Photo
Name
Michael T. Reynolds
Title
Litigation
Title
Partner
Email
mreynolds@cravath.com
Phone
+1-212-474-1552
vCard
Download vCard

    Education

    • J.D., 1995, Yale Law School
    • M.Phil., 1991, University of Cambridge
      Keasbey Scholar
    • A.B., 1990, Dartmouth College
      Phi Beta Kappa, magna cum laude

    Admitted In

    • New York
    Photo
    Name
    Lauren A. Moskowitz
    Title
    Litigation
    Title
    Partner
    Email
    lmoskowitz@cravath.com
    Phone
    +1-212-474-1648
    vCard
    Download vCard

      Education

      • J.D., 2005, Fordham University School of Law
        magna cum laude
      • B.A., 2002, Cornell University

      Admitted In

      • New York

      Cravath Bicentennial

      Celebrating 200 years of partnership. In 2019, we celebrated our bicentennial. Our history mirrors that of our nation. Integral to our story is our culture.

      Explore

      Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
      • CONTACT US
      • OUR STORY
      • ALUMNI PORTAL
      • DISCLAIMERS & NOTICES

      Attorney Advertising. ©2025 Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.