Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Practices
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Our Story
  • The Cravath System
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Pro Bono
  • Alumni Journal
  • 200.Cravath

Cravath’s London Office Moves to 100 Cheapside

Read More

News & Insights

Music Producer Sherman Nealy’s U.S. Supreme Court Victory Affirms Ability to Recover Copyright Damages in Case Against Warner Chappell Music

May 11, 2024

On May 9, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cravath client Sherman Nealy, affirming the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling that the Copyright Act entitles a copyright owner to obtain damages for any timely filed infringement claim, regardless of when the infringement occurred. The Supreme Court’s decision resolves a split between the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits and the Second Circuit and holds that Nealy may seek damages for copyright infringement claims against Warner Chappell Music.

Nealy, a music producer, originally filed suit in Florida federal court in 2018 alleging Flo Rida’s 2008 song “In the Ayer” included an unlicensed sample of “Jam the Box,” a composition Nealy owns, and seeking damages for copyright infringement. Under the Copyright Act, a plaintiff must file suit “within three years after the claim accrued.” The Courts of Appeals interpret that limitations provision to mean that a claim accrues when a plaintiff discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, the infringing act, rather than when an infringing act occurs. That “discovery rule,” Nealy argued, made his claims timely because he filed suit within three years of discovering the infringement upon his release from prison.

The Southern District of Florida accepted that the discovery rule governed the timeliness of Nealy’s claims, but relying on a decision from the Second Circuit, concluded that even if Nealy could sue under the discovery rule for infringements going back to 2008, he could recover damages only for infringements occurring within the three years prior to filing his suit. On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit—citing the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Starz v. MGM, which Cravath successfully litigated—overturned that ruling, rejecting the Second Circuit’s decision that there was a three-year damages bar for an otherwise timely claim, and ruling that Nealy could recover damages going back to 2008. Defendants filed a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, and Cravath assumed representation for Nealy after the petition was granted and handled the merits briefing in the Supreme Court.

Cravath partner Wes Earnhardt, who argued Starz before the Ninth Circuit, delivered arguments on Nealy’s behalf at the Supreme Court in February 2024. In a 6‑3 opinion authored by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court, assuming without deciding that the discovery rule governs the timeliness of the limitations period, affirmed the Eleventh Circuit’s decision. The Court reasoned that the Copyright Act states without qualification that an infringer is liable for damages and profits without time limitation, and that the Second Circuit’s contrary view on top of having no textual support was self‑defeating. While the Second Circuit’s rule would recognize a discovery rule, enabling some copyright owners to sue for infringing acts occurring more than three years earlier, it also would impermissibly take away any ability to recover damages for those older infringements. Nealy, invoking the discovery rule to bring claims for infringing acts occurring more than three years before he filed suit, may obtain damages for all timely claims.

The Cravath team was led by partners Wes Earnhardt, who argued the appeal, and Antony L. Ryan, and included associates Dean M. Nickles, Ming‑Toy A. Taylor and Brian P. Golger. Nicholas Shepard also worked on the matter.

The case is Warner Chappell Music, Inc., et al. v. Nealy et al., No. 22‑1078 (U.S.).

Related Practices & Industries

  • Litigation
  • Appellate
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Media and Entertainment

People

Photo
Name
Wes Earnhardt
Title
Litigation
Title
Partner
Email
wearnhardt@cravath.com
Phone
+1-212-474-1138
vCard
Download vCard

    Education

    • J.D., 2004, University of North Carolina School of Law
    • B.A., 2000, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
      Phi Beta Kappa

    Admitted In

    • New York
    Photo
    Name
    Antony L. Ryan
    Title
    Litigation
    Title
    Partner
    Email
    aryan@cravath.com
    Phone
    +1-212-474-1296
    vCard
    Download vCard

      Education

      • J.D., 1995, Harvard Law School
        magna cum laude
      • B.A., 1992, Yale College
        Phi Beta Kappa, summa cum laude

      Admitted In

      • New York
      Photo
      Name
      Dean M. Nickles
      Title
      Litigation
      Title
      Of Counsel
      Email
      dnickles@cravath.com
      Phone
      +1-212-474-1135
      vCard
      Download vCard

        Education

        • J.D., 2016, University of Notre Dame Law School
          summa cum laude
        • B.A., 2013, Villanova University
          magna cum laude

        Admitted In

        • New York

        Related News & Insights

        Deals & Cases

        May 02, 2024

        Root’s Sixth Circuit Win Affirming Dismissal of Putative Securities Class Action

        On April 29, 2024, a three‑judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of Cravath clients Root, Inc., an insurance company primarily focused on automobile insurance, and certain of its officers and directors (collectively, “Root”) in affirming the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio’s dismissal of a purported class action securities complaint. The decision is a precedential opinion that creates new law of the circuit.

        Deals & Cases

        April 29, 2024

        Mylan’s Appellate Win Affirming Summary Judgment in Securities Class Action

        On Monday, April 15, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Cravath client Mylan in a securities class action related to Mylan’s marketing, pricing and classification of EpiPen as well as alleged conduct concerning generic drug price fixing and market allocation.

        Deals & Cases

        February 22, 2024

        New York State Appellate Division Reverses Wrongful Criminal Conviction Resulting from Consolidated Indictments

        On February 13, 2024, the New York State Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the convictions of Tommy Davis, who was simultaneously prosecuted for two unrelated incidents involving firearms. Cravath represented Mr. Davis on a pro bono basis alongside co‑counsel at the Office of the Appellate Defender.

        Deals & Cases

        November 27, 2023

        PG&E Secures California Supreme Court Victory Shielding Company from Liability for Public Safety Power Shutoffs

        On November 20, 2023, the California Supreme Court held that Cravath client PG&E, the country’s largest utility, cannot be sued for losses incurred by customers during public safety power shutoffs that complied with the guidelines set forth by its regulator, the California Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”). In a unanimous decision, the Court held that such claims are barred because their adjudication would interfere with the PUC’s comprehensive supervision and regulation of safety shutoffs.

        Cravath Bicentennial

        Celebrating 200 years of partnership. In 2019, we celebrated our bicentennial. Our history mirrors that of our nation. Integral to our story is our culture.

        Explore

        Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Logo
        • CONTACT US
        • OUR STORY
        • ALUMNI PORTAL
        • DISCLAIMERS & NOTICES

        Attorney Advertising. ©2025 Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.